Search for: All records

ABSTRACT Non‐perennial streams are globally prevalent. These streams are vital components of ecosystems, yet their drying patterns and resulting impacts on hydrologic connectivity remain poorly understood at the watershed scale. Aridity is a dominant driver of stream drying, but its influences on hydrologic connectivity have not been fully explored. In this study, we investigated the role of aridity in shaping streamflow and connectivity patterns in non‐perennial stream networks that span the continental United States aridity gradient. Using hydrologic models, we simulated daily streamflow and stream network connectivity under current and future climate scenarios. Our findings support previous research showing that aridity and streamflow are strongly linked. We also found that connectivity was related to aridity, although this relationship was weaker. Under the future climate scenario, mean runoff increased in most watersheds in the future, while mean connectivity decreased in the majority of watersheds. This difference is an indicator of the complex relationship between streamflow and connectivity. Aridity was a strong predictor of changes in very high and very low connectivity periods that resulted from climate change, but aridity did not predict changes in mean connectivity. Arid watersheds tended to experience more high connectivity days due to climate change while humid networks tended to have more low connectivity days. By modelling climate impacts at the network scale and across a broad hydroclimatic gradient, we highlight the importance of considering context‐dependent changes in network connectivity in river flow management and watershed conservation plans. 

Abstract Studies of stream macroinvertebrates traditionally use sampling methods that target benthic habitats. These methods could underestimate biodiversity if important assemblage components exist outside of the benthic zone. To test the efficacy of different sampling methods, we collected paired reach‐wide benthic and edge samples from up to 10 study reaches in nine basins spanning an aridity gradient across the United States. Edge sampling targeted riparian‐adjacent microhabitats not typically sampled, including submerged vegetation, roots, and overhanging banks. We compared observed richness, asymptotic richness, and assemblage dissimilarity between benthic samples alone and different combinations of benthic and edge samples to determine the magnitude of increased diversity and assemblage dissimilarity values with the addition of edge sampling. We also examined how differences in richness and assemblage composition varied across an aridity gradient. The addition of edge sampling significantly increased observed richness (median increase = 29%) and asymptotic richness (median increase = 173%). Similarly, median Bray–Curtis dissimilarity values increased by as much as 0.178 when benthic and edge samples were combined. Differences in richness metrics were generally higher in arid basins, but assemblage dissimilarity either increased or decreased across the aridity gradient depending on how benthic and edge samples were combined. Our results suggest that studies that do not sample stream edges may significantly underestimate reach diversity and misrepresent assemblage compositions, with effects that can vary across climates. We urge researchers to carefully consider sampling methods in field studies spanning climatic zones and the comparability of existing data sets when conducting data synthesis studies.